Reading Time: 2 minutes

The legal battles challenging former President Donald Trump’s inclusion on primary ballots in Colorado and Maine have garnered attention, signaling potential Supreme Court involvement. These disputes are anticipated to be quashed, as opined by legal scholars. However, these challenges aren’t confined to Trump. Democrats are wielding similar tactics nationwide, aiming to oust Republican candidates from ballots. The New York Post reported a Pennsylvania Democrat’s effort to remove Congressman Scott Perry’s name from the ballot, an endeavor echoed in other instances.

As Trump faces exclusion from the 2024 election, a parallel situation emerges with Rep. Scott Perry in Pennsylvania, illustrating Democrats’ campaign to purge ballot entries under the guise of ‘ballot cleansing.’ This relentless targeting of congressional candidates is rooted in branding opponents as ‘insurrectionists’ for questioning President Biden’s election win.

The actions of individuals like former congressional candidate Gene Stilp, recognized for burning MAGA flags with swastikas outside courthouses, typify the extreme measures undertaken to disqualify candidates. Similar sentiments were echoed in Representative Cori Bush’s bill, supported by numerous Democrats, intending to remove Republican members from ballots due to their reluctance to denounce the January 6 events.

This trend extends beyond federal races, infiltrating state and local arenas. Instances in Pennsylvania, such as a state senator filing an ethics complaint against Republican state senator Doug Mastriano to bar him from the ballot, exemplify this concerning pattern replicated across various states. Alarmingly, none of these targeted individuals have faced charges related to insurrection, emphasizing the speculative nature of these attempts.

The prevailing hypocrisy within the Democratic Party is strikingly evident. Instances involving Congressman Jamie Raskin, who contested the 2016 election certification based on alleged Russian interference, are highlighted against his current efforts to preemptively remove Trump from the ballot. The selective tolerance for election challenges, often disregarding previous actions by prominent Democrats like Stacey Abrams and Hillary Clinton, reflects a double standard.

The motivation behind these actions appears rooted in the looming electoral fallout anticipated by Democrats. Amidst a backdrop of discontentment with President Biden’s policies and dwindling popularity, Democrats fear a potential down-ballot backlash. Consequently, the attempt to eliminate opposition by coercing their absence from the ballot emerges as a desperate maneuver to secure electoral advantages.

While seemingly improbable, the Democrats’ push to remove opposition from ballots aligns with the peculiarities of contemporary politics, where unusual occurrences and unprecedented actions have become somewhat normalized. This extraordinary and undemocratic approach, while seemingly far-fetched, aligns with the unforeseen oddities that have become woven into our contemporary political fabric.