Reading Time: < 1 minute

The Biden campaign’s stance on the 2024 election has taken a sharp turn as they now question the validity of polling data, citing it as fake. This shift marks a significant departure from their previous reliance on polls and their positive portrayal of survey results. The catalyst for this change was The New York Times’ release of battleground polls showing Donald Trump leading in several swing states, including Nevada, a state Biden had won in the previous election.

The response from Biden-Harris headquarters was swift and critical of the polls, particularly those indicating a double-digit lead for Trump in Nevada. The campaign’s reaction, posted after MSNBC’s Morning Joe reported the results, reflected frustration and disbelief at the numbers, highlighting the irony of previous trust in polls now being discarded when unfavorable.

The criticism extended to the practice of dismissing unfavorable polls as “slanted,” a tactic known as “unskewing” that has historically yielded poor results, especially for Republicans. While acknowledging that not every poll is accurate, the campaign emphasized the uncertainty in determining which polls are reliable, leading to the popularity of polling aggregates for a more comprehensive view.

Despite attempts to label the Times survey as an outlier, Trump’s lead in the overall polling aggregate suggests a significant advantage that could translate into an electoral landslide given the electoral college dynamics. The Biden campaign’s response reflects a sense of desperation and concern as they perceive their grip on the election slipping away.

Ultimately, the blame for the campaign’s predicament is placed on Biden’s policy decisions and leadership, with criticisms of his presidency contributing to public dissatisfaction. The mention of “muh democracy” and January 6th alludes to broader political narratives and challenges faced by the Biden administration as they navigate a contentious political landscape.